Edgar Degas (1834-1917)
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial int… Read more The Defining Gesture: Modern Masters from the Eppler Family CollectionIn the summer of 1946, Picasso fell in love with a new young muse, Françoise Gilot, whom he had met in 1943. In early August, they traveled to the home of Louis Fort at Golfe Juan. It was there, in August 1946, that Picasso met Romuald Dor de la Souchère, curator of the Antibes museum, located in the Grimaldi palace. He offered Picasso space in the museum for painting, but Picasso instead decided to decorate the museum itself. He intensively worked for two months and decorated the walls with twenty-two panels. The wall decoration, featuring Arcadian themes, became known as the antipolis series after the ancient Greek name for Antibes. Shortly afterward, the museum was renamed the Musée Picasso. The subject matter of Arcadia and its inhabitants (fauns, satyrs, centaurs), embodies Picasso's exhilaration and excitement about his new love, impending fatherhood (Gilot became pregnant in August) and, most importantly, his regained freedom after years of war. Picasso's pictures and works on paper from this period thus combine the classical Mediterranean tradition with a new vision, both childlike and complex. The present work, although titled Le combat des centaures (The Fight between Centaurs), features the battle between a faun and a centaur, and belongs to a series of drawings on this theme, executed between 21-26 August 1946. The series evolves from drawings which depict the faun and centaur facing one another, to the centaur approaching the faun from the right, spear in hand, followed by drawings like the present work which depict the centaur turned away from the faun, in an attempt to flee before the faun shoots his arrow. The next work in the series shows the wounded centaur, collapsed to the ground with the faun’s arrow through its chest, and the final two works depict the death of the centaur (fig. 1).Michael FitzGerald has written about this series: “Through the remainder of 1946, Picasso elaborated the imagined and real confrontations between himself and Françoise, but, increasingly, their personal relationship became absorbed into larger themes. In August he made a series of drawings that show a pitched battle between a faun and a centaur and end with the faun standing in mourning over his foe. Yet Picasso immediately proposed an alternative: the series resumes with the centaur’s resurrection, now as a beautiful woman, whose dance is joined by the joyous faun (fig. 2). The woman bears Françoise’s features, and Françoise’s birth sign of Sagittarius links her with the centaur as well” (“A Triangle of Ambitions: Art, Politics, and Family during the Postwar Years with Françoise Gilot,” Picasso and Portraiture, Representation and Transformation, exh. cat., The Museum of Modern Art, New York, 1996, p. 424).The Defining Gesture: Modern Masters from the Eppler Family Collection
Edgar Degas (1834-1917)

Danse espagnole

Details
Edgar Degas (1834-1917)
Danse espagnole
stamped with signature, numbered and stamped with foundry mark 'Degas 20/G A.A. HÉBRARD CIRE PERDUE ' (Lugt 658; on the top of the base)
bronze with dark brown and green patina
Height: 15 ¾ in. (40 cm.)
Original wax model executed circa 1885; this bronze version cast at a later date in an edition numbered A to T, plus two casts reserved for the Degas heirs and the founder Hébrard, marked HER.D and HER respectively
Provenance
Durand-Ruel Galleries, New York (December 1922).
P. Marianotti, Milan.
Private collection, Stockholm.
M. Knoedler & Co., Inc., New York (acquired from the above, March 1965).
Leonard Hutton Gallery, New York (acquired from the above, June 1968).
Harriet Griffin Gallery, New York.
Acquired from the above by the present owner, March 1981.
Literature
J. Rewald, ed., Degas, Works in Sculpture, A Complete Catalogue, New York, 1944, p. 27, no. LXVI (another cast illustrated, p. 130).
J. Rewald and L. Von Matt, Degas Sculpture, The Complete Works, Zurich, 1956, p. 156, no. LXVI (another cast illustrated, pl. 51).
F. Russoli and F. Minervino, L'opera completa di Degas, Milan, 1970, p. 141, no. S16 (another cast illustrated).
J. Rewald, Degas's Complete Sculpture, Catalogue Raisonné, San Francisco, 1990, p. 170, no. LXVI (original wax model illustrated, p. 170; another cast illustrated, p. 171).
A. Pingeot, Degas Sculptures, Paris, 1991, p. 160, no. 16 (another cast illustrated).
S. Campbell, "Degas, The Sculptures, A Catalogue Raisonné," Apollo, vol. CXLII, no. 402, August 1995, pp. 20-21, no. 20 (another cast illustrated, p. 20).
J.S. Czestochowski and A. Pingeot, Degas Sculptures, Catalogue Raisonné of the Bronzes, Memphis, 2002, p. 161, no. 20 (another cast illustrated in color, pp. 160-161).
S. Campbell, R. Kendall, D. Barbour and S. Sturman, Degas in the Norton Simon Museum, Pasadena, 2009, vol. II, pp. 298-300 and 517-518, no. 51 (another cast illustrated in color, pp. 298-299; details of another cast illustrated in color, p. 298).
S.G. Lindsay, D.S. Barbour and S.G. Sturman, Edgar Degas Sculpture, Wahsington, D.C., 2010, p. 369 (original wax model illustrated in color).
Special Notice
On occasion, Christie's has a direct financial interest in the outcome of the sale of certain lots consigned for sale. This will usually be where it has guaranteed to the Seller that whatever the outcome of the auction, the Seller will receive a minimum sale price for the work. This is known as a minimum price guarantee. This is a lot where Christie’s holds a direct financial guarantee interest.
Sale Room Notice
Please note the amended provenance for the present lot:
Private collection, Stockholm, 1965.
M. Knoedler & Co., Inc., New York (acquired from the above, March 1965).
Leonard Hutton Gallery, New York (acquired from the above, June 1968).
Harriet Griffin Gallery, New York.
Acquired from the above by the present owner, March 1981.

Brought to you by

Vanessa Fusco
Vanessa Fusco

Lot Essay

Dancers account for forty of the seventy-four sculptures that Degas modeled in wax and are known today. Many of these relate to the strict discipline and technique of classical ballet as practiced by the French dance masters and choreographers of the late 19th century. A most remarkable exception, however, is the present sculpture, La danse espagnole, which stands out among the rest for its spontaneous sense of excited abandon and sensuality, characteristics that clearly relate to its Spanish theme.
All things Spanish were very much on the minds of French artists, writers and musicians from mid-century onwards (fig. 1). The French king Louis-Philippe, an ardent Hispanophile, bought large numbers of Spanish artworks during the 1830s for his Galerie Espagnole in Paris. Degas visited Spain in 1889, after he modeled La danse espagnole, but his eye for Spanish painting had already made itself known in his art, especially in his portraits, even if he only rarely treated overtly Spanish subjects.
Spanish dance troupes had been a popular attraction in Paris from the 1830s onward. Conservative dance specialists resisted the intrusion of Spanish elements into classic French ballet, but others, such as the choreographer Carlo Blasis, prized the Spanish character in dance for its "hauteur, pride, love and arrogance" (quoted in S.G. Lindsay, D.S. Barbour and S.G. Sturman, op. cit., p. 159). By Degas' time, the movements of a suitably Europeanized interpretation of Spanish dance forms were standard among balletic character steps. Georges Bizet transposed colorful folkloric elements into the music, drama and dance of his opera Carmen, which premiered in Paris in 1875.
Charles Millard has observed in La danse espagnole "a spiral configuration that rises through the hip-shot torso, around the curving left arm, turned head, and up through the raised right arm, whence it returned to the body by the relationship of the hand to the head...a sculptural statement of a sophistication unrivalled in the nineteenth century. The curving and spiraling of the forms completely does away with any sense of frontality, and the figure is wholly satisfactory from any angle" (The Sculpture of Edgar Degas, Princeton, 1976, pp. 102-103).
"The extreme torsion of this figure is more often associated with the statuettes of bathers and nudes," Jill DeVonyar and Richard Kendall have noted. "It remains, however, a masterful achievement, both as an acute record of a superbly trained professional with an elegantly pointed foot and turned-out leg, and as a thrilling conjunction of rippling surfaces and taut, resilient forms" (Degas and the Dance, exh. cat., American Federation of the Arts, New York, 2002, p. 140).

More from Impressionist and Modern Art Day Sale

View All
View All