PIETER BRUEGHEL II (BRUSSELS 1564/5-1637/8 ANTWERP)
PIETER BRUEGHEL II (BRUSSELS 1564/5-1637/8 ANTWERP)
PIETER BRUEGHEL II (BRUSSELS 1564/5-1637/8 ANTWERP)
2 More
PROPERTY OF THE DESCENDENTS OF THE BLOCH-BAUER FAMILY
PIETER BRUEGHEL II (BRUSSELS 1564/5-1637/8 ANTWERP)

The Birdtrap

Details
PIETER BRUEGHEL II (BRUSSELS 1564/5-1637/8 ANTWERP)
The Birdtrap
oil on panel
16 x 22 1/4 in. (41 x 56.5 cm.)
Provenance
Aloys Thomas Raimund, Count Harrach (1669-1742), Palais Harrach, Vienna, by descent.
with Galerie Sanct Lucas, Vienna, after 1952.
with Xavier Scheidwimmer, Munich, by 1977, where acquired by the present owner.
Literature
Catalog der Erlaucht Graf von Harrach'schen Bildergallerie, Vienna, 1897, no. 101, as After Pieter Brueghel II.
R. van Bastelaer, Peter Bruegel l'Ancien: Son œuvre et son temps: Catalogue raisonné de son œuvre peint par G.H[ulin] de Loo, Brussels, 1907, p. 345, under no. B 35.
G. Glück, Das Grosse Bruegel-Werk, Vienna and Munich, 1963, p. 74, under no. 31.
G. Marlier, Pierre Brueghel, Le Jeune, Brussels, 1969, p. 247, no. 48.
Die Weltkunst, XLVII, 1977, p. 1951.
'Notable works of art now on the market: supplement', Burlington Magazine, CXIX, 1977, n.p., pl. XII.
K. Ertz, Pieter Brueghel der Jüngere (1564-1637/38): Die Gemälde mit kritischem Oeuvrekatalog, II, Lingen, 1988/2000, p. 607, no. E694, illustrated.

Brought to you by

John Hawley
John Hawley Specialist

Lot Essay

As Klaus Ertz noted (loc. cit.), this picture 'belongs to one of the best versions' of what is arguably the Brueghel dynasty’s most iconic invention and one of the most enduringly popular compositions of the Netherlandish landscape tradition. Although no fewer than 127 versions from the family’s studio and followers have survived, fewer than fifty are now believed to be autograph works by Pieter Brueghel II himself, with the remainder being largely workshop copies of varying degrees of quality (K. Ertz, op. cit., pp. 605-30, nos. E682 to A805a).

Debate remains as to which member of the Brueghel family devised the prototype for this successful composition. Traditionally, the prototype has been thought to be a painting attributed to Pieter Bruegel I, signed and dated 1565, now in the Musées Royaux des Beaux-Arts, Brussels. That view is not, however, beyond dispute: although Friedländer considered it to be an autograph work by the Elder, authors as early as Groomann and Glück were doubtful of the attribution, and the question remains open. Another signed version, dated by Shipp to 1564, formerly in the A. Hassid collection in London, has also been considered to be the original by the Elder. Moreover, the invention of this popular composition could be entirely Pieter the Younger’s or alternatively that of his younger sibling Jan (for a summary of the debate, see Ertz in Breughel-Brueghel, exhibition catalogue, Essen, Antwerp and Vienna, 1997-1998, pp. 169-171). Beyond doubt is that the design of the Birdtrap was inspired, to a great degree, by Pieter the Elder’s celebrated masterpiece Hunters in the Snow of 1565, belonging to the artist’s famous cycle of the Seasons (fig. 1; Kunsthistorisches Museum, Vienna; the others: Lobkowicz Palace, Prague; and Metropolitan Museum of Art, New York).

Whatever the prototype, the distinctive beauty of the composition remains unchallenged. After the Vienna picture, the view is one of the earliest pure representations of the Netherlandish landscape (in the catalogue of the exhibition Le siècle de Brueghel, Brussels, Musées Royaux des Beaux-Arts, 27 September-24 November 1963, p. 69, George Marlier identified the village depicted as Pede-Ste-Anne in Brabant, the silhouette in the background being that of Antwerp) and one of the seminal examples of the theme of the winter landscape. In contrast to the Elder’s Hunters in the Snow, where the figures walk through a rather somber, still countryside, where the air is clear and biting cold, in Pieter the Younger’s Birdtrap, the figures are enjoying the pleasures of winter in a more welcoming atmosphere.

The painting indeed offers a vivid evocation of the various delights of wintertime: in the landscape blanketed in snow, a merry band of country folk are skating, curling, playing skittles and hockey on a frozen river. The cold winter air, conveyed with remarkable accuracy by the artist’s muted palette, mainly made up of blues and earthy tonalities, is intelligently broken up through the bright red frocks worn by some of the figures, enlivening the whole picture. This painting includes two figures which add a degree of lewdness which is lacking in most of the other versions: the bare-bottomed woman who has fallen on the ice and the defecating man by the side of the cottage at right. Yet the most characteristic feature of the composition is the almost graphic, intricate network of entwined bare branches set against the snow or the light winter sky. It creates a lace-like, almost abstract pattern of the utmost decorative effect.

But beneath the seemingly anecdotal, light-hearted subject lies a moral commentary on the precariousness of life: below one of Pieter Bruegel I’s engravings, Winter – Ice skating before St. George’s Gate, Antwerp, is the inscription Lubricitas Vitae Humanae. La Lubricité de la vie humaine. Die Slibberachtigheyt van’s Menschen Leven, that is the ‘Slipperiness [or fragility] of human life’ was added. This label invests the Birdtrap with new meaning: the picture emphasizes the obliviousness of the birds towards the threat of the trap, which, in turn, is mirrored by the carefree play of the skaters upon the flimsy ice. Likewise, the fishing hole in the center of the frozen river, waiting for the unwary skater, and the figures of the two children running heedlessly towards their parents across the ice despite the latter’s warning cries, function as a reminder of the dangers that lurk beneath the innocent pleasures of the Flemish winter countryside. Brueghel delivers with this fine work a message of lasting poignancy about the uncertainty and fickleness of existence.

A NOTE ON THE PROVENANCE

The earliest recorded owner of this painting is Aloys Thomas Raimund, Count Harrach, who assembled an important private collection of Old Master paintings in the early decades of the eighteenth century. Aloys von Harrach served as envoy of the Austrian Emperor in Dresden (1694; 1711) and Spain (1697-1700), held diplomatic positions in Berlin and Hanover and was ‘Landmarschall’ in Lower Austria (1715-1742) and Viceroy of Naples (1728-1733), positions that afforded him opportunities to acquire exceptional works of art. The collection was displayed at Palais Harrach, a Baroque palace in Vienna designed by Domenico Martinelli in the final years of the seventeenth century, and much of it can now be seen at Schloss Rohrau in Lower Austria. This painting was among a number of works which left the collection in the second half of the twentieth century.

After departing the Harrach’sche Sammlung, the painting has in recent decades formed part of the choice collection assembled by the Bentley family, whose collecting lineage finds its roots in the esteemed Bloch-Bauer family. Ferdinand Bloch-Bauer (1864-1945) and his wife, Adele (1881-1925), were leading patrons of the arts in Vienna at the turn of the twentieth century. The couple formed close relationships with the composers and conductors Gustav Mahler (1860-1911) and Richard Strauss (1864-1949) and, most famously, the painter Gustav Klimt (1862-1918), for whom Adele sat for two full-length portraits. In 2006, Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer I, completed between 1903 and 1907 (fig. 2; Neue Galerie, New York), achieved a then world record price for a work of art when, following its restitution, the painting was sold by Ferdinand’s niece, Maria Altmann, for $135 million. Later that year, a then world auction record for the artist was established when the Portrait of Adele Bloch-Bauer II (1912) was sold in these Rooms on 8 November 2006 for nearly $88 million.

More from Old Masters

View All
View All