CRISTO VIVO
CRISTO VIVO
CRISTO VIVO
5 More
CRISTO VIVO
8 More
CRISTO VIVO

GASPARO MOLA (ACTIVE FLORENCE 1571-1640 ROME), FLORENCE, CIRCA 1597-1606, THE CROSS AND BASE PROBABLY MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY

Details
CRISTO VIVO
GASPARO MOLA (ACTIVE FLORENCE 1571-1640 ROME), FLORENCE, CIRCA 1597-1606, THE CROSS AND BASE PROBABLY MID-TWENTIETH CENTURY
gold figure; on a later rock crystal cross and base
10 1⁄2 (26.7 cm.) high, gold corpus; 19 3⁄4 in. (50.2 cm.) high, overall
Literature
COMPARATIVE LITERATURE
C. Avery, Giambologna: Sculpture by the Master and His Followers, New York, 1998, pp. 68-91.
A. Di Lorenzo (ed.), ‘Il Crocifisso d’oro del Museo Poldi Pezzoli, Giambologna e Gasparo Mola’, Quaderni di Studi e Restauri del Museo Poldi Pezzoli, IX, Milan, 2011.
E. Heller, Icons or Portraits? Images of Jesus and Mary from the Collection of Michael Hall, New York, 2002, no. 79, pp. 198-201.

Brought to you by

John Hawley
John Hawley Specialist

Lot Essay

The present crucifix is an incredibly fine and rare survival of a statuette in gold from the Renaissance. Gold has long had a mythical quality, and during the Renaissance it was considered the finest and most luxurious material, only available to the richest royal and ecclesiastical authorities. The ability to make statues in gold was one of the hardest challenges for an artist, and accordingly only specialized goldsmiths were allowed to work with such a precious commodity. The present crucifix can now be added to the oeuvre of the Medici goldsmith Gasparo Mola, who gained fame across Europe for his unsurpassed ability to work with gold. Unpublished and unknown until now, and as a Cristo Vivo, rather than a Cristo Morto as are the other three examples, the present crucifix is an exciting addition to a tiny, but important and prestigious, group of gold sculptures by Gasparo Mola.

The Crucifix in the Renaissance
During the Italian Renaissance the carving of a Crucifix became an occasion for a sculptor to demonstrate his mastery in his field. The Crucifix was no longer just an object of devotion but at the same time a manifesto of a sculptor’s understanding of anatomy and their ability to create a work of art of extreme sanctity. Vasari recorded how Brunelleschi criticized the exaggerated naturalism of a wooden crucifix by Donatello, calling it a 'peasant on the cross' instead of the body of Jesus Christ. Challenged by Donatello to do better, Brunelleschi carved such a sublime work that at the sight of it Donatello dropped to the ground and smashed the eggs in his lap that he had brought for dinner (G. Vasari, Lives of the Painters, Sculptors and Architects, vol. 1, translated by Gaston du C. de Vere, republished Everyman's Library, 1996, pp. 328-9). By the end of the sixteenth century, the desire amongst leading artists to tackle this subject and the precepts of the counter-Reformation created a vogue for small Crucifixes amongst the ecclesiastical and aristocratic classes.

Four Gold Crucifixes
The present gold and crucifix is one of four known examples; the other versions are in the Museo della Città, Rimini, in the Museo Poldi Pezzoli, Milan, and the third example was in the collection of Michael Hall and sold December 2, 2019 at Christie's, London (fig. 1; £671,250). The Rimini example was donated to the city of Rimini on the 27th March 1612 by Cardinal Michelangelo Tonti (1566-1622). Tonti was a favorite of Camillo Borghese, who elevated Tonti to Cardinal after he became Pope Paul V in 1605. Tonti was the Pope’s most influential advisor, and through this was able to provide his hometown of Rimini with substantial funding. Tonti’s influence eventually led to his downfall, and he was forced out of Rome in 1612 to settle in Cesena. It was during this journey he visited Rimini and donated the golden crucifix to his citizens. The Poldi Pezzoli example also has an early provenance; it was part of the Riccardi collection, mentioned in the household goods of the Marquesses Gabbriello and Francesco Riccardi in 1671, recorded in several subsequent inventories and almost certainly the same one that was eventually donated to the museum in 1987, due in part to the description of the base in those inventories, which do not correspond to the Rimini or Michael Hall examples (di Lorenzo, loc. cit.).

The Rimini and Pezzoli crucifixes were analyzed closely in a study undertaken by Andrea Di Lorenzo, Davide Gasparotto and Lorenzo Morigi in 2011 (ibid.). This study also identified the Michael Hall example as being entirely original and intact. As the most complete example it was used as a point of comparison for the two other crucifixes. The Hall example preserves the crown of thorns in gold on the head of Christ and is still fixed with three gold nails on its original ebony cross, in which a thin gold thread is inlaid along the entire perimeter. The cross is grafted onto a base made of the same technique, of ebony inlaid with a gold thread. On the cross is a cartouche with the legend ‘INRI’ in gold and polychrome enamels, analogous to the Rimini cross, while at the center of the base is a gold plaque depicting the Lamentation, which is almost identical to the Rimini plaque, except for some additional details. All four crucifixes have the same trapezoidal hole at the reverse, which allowed the sculptor to remove the stucco core from the inside. In contrast to the Michael Hall example, the Rimini cross is a later replacement, as is the base of the Poldi Pezzoli version and the present version has a 20th century cross and base of rock crystal.

The present version, as mentioned above, differs from Mola’s three other gold figures in a major way as it depicts Cristo Vivo, rather than the Cristo Morto. The three other versions present Christ as having already expired, with his head hanging down and with his mouth and eyes closed, at rest at last. In the present version, however, Christ is still very much alive and presents either a more inspiration and hopeful image, or a more anguished one, depending on how one interprets it. In this present version, Christ’s eyes are wide open and look heavenward, and his mouth is also wide open, teeth bared, and is, painfully, still very much a part of this world. This present more animated version also has a more solid, living musculature, with straighter, stronger legs, while the other three versions show Christ’s skeletal structure more clearly and the corpses seem to hang more heavily on the cross with collapsed legs and bent knees. And, like the Hall version, the present version also retains its crown of thorns.

Gasparo Mola: Goldsmith to the Medici
Gasparo Mola first worked in Milan as a goldsmith; his earliest extant work is an engraved silver crucifix, signed and dated 1592 (Church of Tavernerio, near Como). He was then lured to Florence to work for the Grand Duke of Tuscany Ferdinando I de’ Medici. For Ferdinando he is known to have made some richly decorated weapons in gold and enamel, and two bronze panels for the door of the Cathedral of Pisa. In 1597 Mola was given the role of die-cutter at the Florentine Mint.

Mola is documented as having produced crucifixes from gold for the Grand Duke of Tuscany. In 1600 he was asked to produce crucifixes and other items in addition to his job at the Mint. The lack of a salary increase resulted in Mola leaving Florence for Turin, but he was back in Florence by 1609, and created two crucifixes in gold for Cosimo de Medici in 1611-12. Such gold crucifixes realized by Mola for the Medici are listed in several inventories throughout the 17th century (di Lorenzo, op. cit., pp. 29-30). However, these crucifixes measured 3/5 of a braccio fiorentino, approximately 35-40 cm., and therefore do not correspond to the crucifixes mentioned above.

Mola gained great celebrity in his day for his ability to make such sculptures in gold foil. The Hall, Rimini, Poldi Pezzoli and present corpus figures are not cast but have been carefully beaten into form using the repoussé method. The hands and the feet were cast and welded onto the body (ibid, pp. 59-63). This was a difficult and much admired technique, which very few goldsmiths mastered.

Gasparo Mola and Guglielmo della Porta
The source for the model of the present corpus figure has traditionally been attributed to Giambologna, due to his erroneous association with a silver crucifix in the Palazzo Apostolico in Loreto. More recently, Rosario Coppel has attributed the model to the Roman sculptor Guglielmo della Porta (R. Coppel et. al., Guglielmo della Porta: A Counter-Reformation Sculptor, Coll & Cortes, Madrid, 2012, pp. 62-73). Neither della Porta nor Giambologna were goldsmiths themselves, and it is very likely that Mola used and modified a model that della Porta had created by at least 1570.

Further evidence in favor of the attribution to Mola is the inclusion in the bases of the Hall and Rimini crucifixes of a plaque depicting the Lamentation of Christ that derives from a painting by Gaudenzio Ferrari (c.1471-1546), in the Szépmuvészeti Museum, Budapest (inv. no. 3540). It is unusual that a much earlier painting, which dates from between 1527 and 1529, was used as a source for these plaques. However, Gasparo Mola was both a collector and dealer in works of art, and in 1606 he sold this painting to the Duke of Mantua. Before 1606 he presumably owned the painting himself, and thus was able to use it as a model for his plaques. 1606 is therefore a likely terminus ante quem for the creation of the Hall crucifix. While the present version is no longer connected to its original cross and base, as are the Rimini and Hall versions, it does have a very elegant, beautifully constructed and finely worked cross and base of rock crystal which contain almost no flaws or inclusions in the stone.

The presence of fleur-de-lis decoration on the perizonium of the present crucifix, like those on the Rimini and the Michael Hall versions, a motif associated with the city of Florence, together with Mola’s occupation working for both Ferdinando II and Cosimo de Medici, suggests that the present crucifix may also have been a Medici commission, possibly intended as a gift to royal and noble dignitaries abroad.

Gold testing carried out on 17/02/2022 showed a gold purity at approximately 22 karats.

More from Old Masters

View All
View All