細節
李松松
大官兒的下午
油彩 銀箔 畫布
2002年作

來源
中國 北京 藝術文件倉庫
現藏者購自上述畫廊

展覽
2004年12月11日-2005年1月30日「李松松」北京中國藝術文件倉庫 北京 中國

出版
2004年《李松松》北京中國藝術文件倉庫 北京 中國 (圖版,無頁數)

拍品編號 1582之媒材為:油彩 銀箔 畫布


作為中國一位最受注目的青年藝術家,李松松精密地混合感性的畫家造詣,揉合對歷史、政治圖像的巧妙挪移,以迅雷之勢在國際舞台上急速冒起。如同輩藝術家尹朝陽,李生於後毛澤東革命時代,在現代化、全球化之洪流下成長。上一代畫家的藝術取向幾乎全由文化大革命及二十世紀種種波瀾、動盪所定立;李這一輩對歷史的認知則純粹發生於媒體對它的再現,再不像前人般來自第一身經驗。

李的創作擅於建立在現成圖像之上,從分析性的層面切入歷史,強調一種對中國二十世紀段段奇觀的綿延回聲、反覆呼應。李刻意模糊畫面上的邊線製造和人物輪廓的形塑,隱隱地批判著政治秀、權力場上的奇詭現象。這件2002年的作品《大官兒的下午》(Lot 1582),正打造著一個二十世紀上半頁、中華民國時期的非常圖像。

這個在畫面中心正襟危坐、倚著拐杖及頭戴有羽毛的將軍帽盔的人,就是民國時期叱吒風雲的勢力人物段祺瑞。他在1924年11月至1926年4月期間的十七個月內擔任國民政府的軍事領袖及臨時執政長官,於第一次世界大戰中被視為最具權力的人。段無間斷地為軍事和政治服務,去建立及整合自己的軍隊,重新統一那些已分裂的民族,從而提升當時中國在西方列強之間的國際地位。然而,他的功勞並沒有怎麼獲得相對的名譽或應有的成果。而事實上,他當期時展開的閉門談判和在凡爾賽條約中對日本的讓步,正正是引發中國第一次大規模學生運動的導火線,成就著名的五四運動之發生。

畫中的段祺瑞身穿搶眼而莊嚴的軍服,與一眾軍事領袖並排而坐,列席在白露柳樹的田園背景之前。此一作品題目「大官兒的下午」,彷彿在驗證藝術家對歷史帶有諷喻意味的觀點,描繪在1910年間非凡的事業高峰及其相形之下的光輝。再者,畫作反映藝術家在軍政奇觀中發現內裡兒戲的面相,洞悉如此乏力的軍閥遊戲明顯是徹底的徒然。後世讀者思索歷史何以推演至如斯終局,實在難以擺脫當中主角那凝住了的時空、抽離地閱讀畫中群象。曾幾何時那個為了反映政治理想、幾近斷裂的影像,今天卻出奇地變得人性化。畫中人獨一無二的姿態、從其服飾上散發出來的狂妄和荒謬,在藝術家塑造的鬼魅氣氛、深灰色調和鬆散而抽象的筆觸之下一一展露無遺。使來自某個時代那份如同把人類再倒模一次般懾人的虛弱無力感突然顯得如此生疏,然而來得那麼深刻,又那麼久遠。

來源
Chinese Art Archives & Warehouse, Beijing, China
Acquired from the above by the present owner
出版
China Art Archives & Warehouse, Li Songsong, Beijing, China, 2004 (illustrated, unpaged).
展覽
Beijing, China, China Art Archives & Warehouse, Li Songsong, 11 December 2004-30 January 2005.
拍場告示
Please note the correct medium of this lot should be 'oil and silver foil on canvas.'

登入
瀏覽狀況報告

拍品專文

As one of China's best recognized young painters, Li Songsong has quickly built an international reputation through his sophisticated combination of sensuous painterly techniques and appropriated historical and political mass-media images. Like fellow painter Yin Zhaoyang, Li Songsong came of age in the post-Mao era of reform, of rapid modernization and globalization. Unlike older generations of artists, for whom China's Cultural Revolution and the tumultuous 20th Century were formative to their artistic identities, for Li's generation, this history was known mainly through mediated representations rather then through the stuff of personal experience.

Working from found images, Li takes an analytical approach to history, addressing the continuing resonance of the spectacle of China's 20th Century through his painterly investigation of its imagery. Li deliberately blurs the line between mark-making and figuration, subtly critiquing the artifice of political spectacle and power. Big Shot's Afternoon (Lot 1582) from 2002 spotlights an image from the first half of the century during China's Republican period. Seated center-right, leaning on a walking stick and with a plumed general's helmet is Duan Qirui, a powerful military commander and the Provisional Chief Executive of the Republic of China for seventeen months between November 1924 and April 1926, and considered during World War I to be among the most powerful men in China. Duan worked tirelessly as a military and political campaigner to build and consolidate his armies, to re-unify the divided nation, and to raise China's international status among Western allies. His efforts though were hardly popular or successful, and indeed his back-door negotiations and concessions to Japan under the Versailles Treaty led to China's first modern mass student demonstration and the May 4th Movement.

Duan is seated beside other military leaders and cabinet members in extravagant formal attire and before a somewhat bucolic backdrop of weeping willow trees. The title of the painting, "Big Shot's Afternoon", seems to reveal the artist's ironic view of history, suggesting the contrast between the height of Duan's career in the 1910s and the relative ineffectiveness of his brief reign. More generally, the painting suggests Li's view of the frivolity of military and political spectacle, and the apparent ultimate futility of such exploits. Considering how events would eventually unfold, it is difficult not to read the figures in the photograph as wildly out of touch. What was once a divisive image of political ambition is now rendered quaintly human; the figures' distinct poses and attitudes, the absurd pomposity of their uniforms, depicted in ghostly, sepia tones, and loosely abstracted strokes, appear as charmingly frail and human artifacts from a period that suddenly seems profoundly remote.

更多來自 亞洲當代藝術 日間拍賣

查看全部
查看全部