細節
曾梵志
人像
油彩 畫布
2007年作
簽名:曾梵志 Zeng Fanzhi

「假如我們將曾梵志發展中的作品視為他心路歷程的反思,那麼這趟旅程的目的地是哪裡?十年前,他畫中的主角是無助的受害者,居住在一個不合邏輯的世界。接著,他們戴上面具,成為遊手好閒的都會份子,共享膚淺的關係。而現在,這些主角褪下了面具,他們孑然一身,剝離至只剩下血肉,不斷地溶解。拋棄了偽裝,他們現在能夠重建自我意識嗎? 」—Britta Erickson《面具之後的真實》,2001年

1993年,藝術家曾梵志從武漢遷到北京。儘管這樣的舉措,曾梵志還是非常不適應中國首都強烈的都會氛圍與快速發展,而如此的分裂狀態便時常出現在他的作品之中。1990年代初期,北京,甚至是整個中國都面臨了一個動盪不安的歷史時刻,外在變化造成了社會史無前例的快速變遷。當時的中國被迫走進一個未知的世界,對於資本主義或新產生的社會責任,都還沒有做好準備。《面具》系列七年多以來一直是曾梵志最重要的創作主題;他的第一幅《面具》作品是在1993年所創作,當時他剛從住了一輩子的武漢搬遷到北京。在陌生的環境裡,《面具》系列的創作讓曾梵志得以隔絕於人群之外,從旁觀察在重視禮節的社會裡,整個社會期待個人展現的是怎樣的一張「臉」。人們會隱藏自己不愉快的過去或不討喜的人格特質,戴上一副文明的假面具,變成(嚴格來說,應該是表現得像是)一個全新自己。《面具》系列最重要的特色是衝突元素的並置;量身訂作的中產階級西裝與合臉的面具,對比駭人的巨手與少數缺乏皮膚覆蓋的肌腱與肌肉,共同創造出一幅矛盾衝突的圖像。

曾梵志在2000年決定結束《面具》系列,作品中的人物拿下了面具,男男女女都露出閃爍的大眼睛與內心的情感。在他2007年的作品《人像》(Lot 1026) 中,一位男子優雅地穿著深色西裝與閃亮的紅色風衣,和曾梵志早期作品中人的人物相比,我們看到他對於心理的描繪更為深切。誠如林布蘭(Rembrandt van Rijn)的作品,古典文藝復興時期的肖像畫,重點都在於能讓畫作人物栩栩如生的微小細節與特質上 (圖一)。林布蘭特別著重手的位置和面部特徵,並以深色衣服和構圖中強烈的明暗對照為對比,讓他的肖像畫更有穿透心理的曲折變。 儘管曾梵志融合了自己的藝術傳統和主觀性格,如此古典的肖像畫法還是見於他的作品中。事實上,他們的相似之處不僅在於繪畫手法,因為林布蘭這位
藝術家當時也在紀錄阿姆斯特丹新興的資產階級商人。

曾梵志曾說:「我喜歡表達人群或單一個體心情的態度,而且用直接的反應加以臨摹,目的就是傳達對方的表情、情緒、想法,以及我本人對他的感覺;這一切都是在幾小時內捕捉、完成,而不是在學校規定的時間中完成。」《我.我們:曾梵志的繪畫 - 1991-2003》湖北美術出版社 湖北 中國 2003年第56頁)因此,曾梵志的作品不是傳統意義上的畫像,而是他對於其他人的主觀感受。他採用肖像畫法中最必要的手法,剝離到比林布蘭更為極簡的境地。留下的是他畫中人物的衣著、鮮明的特徵、隨意的姿態以及對於環境的細微暗示,作品人物腳跟後揮灑的一筆對角線,暗示主角位於某處街景或內牆前。其他的意符都被消除,作品人物孤單地站在原始、赤裸和抽離的畫布前。作品主角的穿著鮮明,在他之前的作品中,這樣的人物都會戴著面具,因為他象徵的是,被西方傳統和價值觀滲透、在中國社會中新興的中產階級。不同於他早期的作品《醫院》和《肉》系列,曾梵志 2000年後的人像畫主角是非常文明的 (圖二)。在這些作品,人物的特徵、姿態和表情都很沉悶,突顯出他們與環境的疏離,殘酷冷漠地耗時待在省級共產黨醫院這樣官僚的環境中。這個作品的人物主角穿著一絲不苟,合腳的黑色皮鞋以及一件紅色的高領長外套。外套的領口與背心的樣式中,微微發出翠綠的顏色。他的衣物細節都細膩地呈現,而身影的二端都溶解成煙燻水墨。主角客觀的存在與其唯物主義的展現,都和他顯明的自我毀滅形成強烈對比。他鮮明且誇張的特徵,暗示這是與某人相似的漫畫肖像,但是並非針對某一特定人物。在曾梵志最早期的《人像》肖像作品中能發現這令人驚訝的連續性。隨著時間的推移,他的技術已經變得更加細膩,主題與意象也已發生變化,但是空泛與呆滯的表現仍然存在。諷刺的是,無論曾梵志在《醫院》作品中觀察到多少苦難,這些畫作的觀察基礎還是來自於更為廣闊的社會環境與人際社群。這裡的社會氛圍是以其缺席呈現。新資本主義下的消費社會已經解放了個人,讓個體擁有了自主權,成為自我創造與自我表現的代理人。但曾梵志認為,這是環境的遞換,只是用異化取代了另一個異,作品主角最終還是完全孤獨地與自我共處。因此,曾梵志再次展現了非凡的洞察力,細膩觀察社會環境的轉向與個體生活中情緒與心理的壓力。

登入
瀏覽狀況報告

拍品專文

Zeng Fanzhi - Portrait

"If we consider Zeng Fanzhi's developing oeuvre as reflective of a psychological journey, where does that journey lead? Ten years ago the protagonists in his paintings were helpless victims inhabiting an illogical world. Next, they donned masks to participate in a realm of urban flaneurs sharing superficial relationships. Now the masks are off and the protagonists are utterly alone, stripped to raw flesh and dissolving. Having abandoned pretense, can they now rebuild a sense of self?"
-Britta Erickson, Raw Behind the Mask, 2001

The artist Zeng Fanzhi moved from Wuhan - a place he had lived his entire life - to Beijing in 1993. Despite this move, Zeng Fanzhi was not quite ready for the intense cosmopolitan environment and rapid development of China's capital city, a disjuncture often revisited in his works. Beijing and indeed China in the early 1990s was in the throws of a uniquely challenging historical situation, where superficial change altered the fabric of everyday life faster than ever before. The Chinese as a nation were not ready for capitalism, or for the new social performances thrust upon them as they were compelled into a world previously unknown. In these unfamiliar new surroundings, the creation of the Mask series insulated Zeng and allowed him to identify the kind of 'face' one was expected to show in polite society. The strong juxtaposition of contrasting elements gave the Mask series its powerful visual and emotional impact: the paradoxical image of tailored bourgeois suits and fitted masks coupled with the engorged hands and glimpses of skinned flesh with exposed sinews.

The Mask series began to dissolve in 2000 when Zeng began literally removing the mask from his subjects, exposing large gleaming eyes and the inner emotions of the depicted men and women. In his Portrait from 2007 (Lot 1026), we find a man elegantly dressed in a dark suit and gleaming red trench coat, and we see the deepening of Zeng's psychological and portrait studies by contrasting the work with other classical portraits and the artist's own earlier series. Classical Renaissance portraits, like those of Rembrandt van Rijn, focused on a minimum of details and attributes to bring their subjects to life (Fig. 1). Rembrandt in particular relied on the position of the hands and facial features, often in contrast to the dark clothes and deep chiaroscuro of the composition, to give a more psychological penetrating inflection to his portraits. This fundamentally classical approach to portraiture can be found in Zeng's works as well, albeit with the twists of his own artistic legacy and subjective disposition. Indeed, the parallels to Rembrandt extend beyond just compositional tools, as the artist was also a chronicler of the emergent merchant capitalist class of Amsterdam.

Zeng has stated, "I was interested in expressing the attitudes of moods of people, an individual person, and to do in a direct response, aimed at conveying the person's expression, emotion, thinking, and my own sense of that person" (I/We: The Painting of Zeng Fanzhi 1991-2003, Hubei Arts Press, Hebei, China, 2003, p. 56). As such, Zeng's works are not portraits in the traditional sense, but portraits of his own subjective feelings towards others. He takes the essential tools of portraiture and strips them to an even greater minimum than Rembrandt, leaving us only with his subject's sartorial choices, his sharp features, a casually composed posture and the slightest hint of an environment with the slashing diagonal stroke behind his heels, suggesting a street scene or interior wall. All other signifiers are eliminated, and the figure stands alone against the raw and starkly unarticulated canvas. Dressed with distinction, previously such a figure would appear masked, as he stands for a symbol of China's emerging middle class echelon of society, one penetrated by Western traditions and values. Unlike the figures of his earlier Hospital and Meat series, the men of Zeng's post-2000 paintings are immensely civilized (Fig. 2). In those works, Zeng's figures' features, poses, and expressions were marked by a dullness that spoke to their alienation from their environment, highlighting the cruel indifference of time spent in a bureaucratic environment like a provincial communist hospital. Here the figure is dressed fastidiously, in a dark fitted, black leather shoes, and a long, high collared, cardinal red coat. An emerald green shimmers from the lining of the coat and the pattern of his vest. The details of his dress are finely rendered, while the extremes of his figure dissolve into a smoky inkwash. The figure's material presence and literal materialism is therefore contrasted with his apparent annihilation. His features are sharp and exaggerated, to suggest a caricature and a probable likeness to someone, and yet to no one in particular. A surprising continuity can then be found in this oritrait with Zeng's earliest works. Over time, while his technique has become more refined, motifs and imagery have changed, but the blank, dulled expressions remain. Ironically, whatever suffering Zeng might have observed in his Hospital works, those paintings were still based on observations of a broader social milieu, of communities. Here, the social milieu is present by virtue of its absence. A newly capitalist, consumerist society has liberated the individual to become a free agent, agents of self-invention and self-representation. But Zeng suggests that this is an exchange of environments that has only replaced one alienation with another, leaving his subjects utterly alone with themselves. As such, Zeng once again demonstrates his extraordinary insight into the shifting dynamics of his social environment, and the emotional and psychological strain it places on individual lives.

更多來自 亞洲當代藝術及中國二十世紀藝術晚間拍賣

查看全部
查看全部