ZHANG XIAOGANG
Property from a Private Collection of Chinese Contemporary Art
張曉剛

血緣:大家庭 — 父與子

細節
張曉剛
血緣:大家庭 — 父與子
油彩 畫布
2001年作
簽名:張曉剛 Zhang Xiaogang

來源
中國當代藝術私人收藏
私人收藏

展覽
2001年5月「藝壇精英:學院與非學院」藝博畫廊 上海 中國
2009年3月27日-6月28日「張曉剛:靈魂上的影子」昆士蘭現代美術館 昆士蘭 澳洲

出版
2001年《藝壇精英:學院與非學院》藝博畫廊 上海 中國 (圖版,第89頁)
2009年《The China Project》昆士蘭現代美術館 昆士蘭 澳洲 (圖版,第218頁)


歷史、肖像、畫作

我們可以於創作於2001年的巨幅油畫《血緣:大家庭—父與子》,看到張曉剛擴大系列的包容性,那些核心性的內容變得更加仔細,在肖像的探索方面顯得更為深刻,在闡釋命運和歷史的本質之上形成獨一無二的繪畫視野。

張曉剛早受到格哈.德里希特的寫實照片作品所啟蒙,期後他在1990年前期訪問歐洲,在美術館內觀摩了那些他在學生時代鍾愛的藝術家作品,他了解到自己的筆法及意趣與那些藝術家有多麼不同。德里希特營造一種靜物照片的繪畫感,但張曉剛卻企圖以更誇張的攝影效果來創作,正如他自己所說,他是「追求創作一種『偽照片』的效果—重新美化那些『被修飾』過的歷史和生活」。由此,張曉剛投入到一個我們熟識的,得到公認的視覺模式,即家庭照片及肖像描繪,來批判性地探討我們自己的感情聯繫和假設。一種與歷史和記憶相似的關係可見於海波的攝影作品,他以舊家庭照片為出發,然後聚集原照中的真實人物再拍一幅新照片。照片中部份人物的的缺席及細節顯得強而有力,比如已逝世的姐妹,又或者是年邁與疲態刻在昔日的健壯青年面上。然而張氏的想法不是要作單純的記錄,他的目的是通過照片的啟發去表達他那一代人的集體記憶。張曉剛說:「對我而言,文化大革命不是一個歷史事實,而是一種心理狀態。它與我的童年有一個很密切的聯繫,而且我認為很多事情是與今天中華民族的今昔的心理連結。

這些關於回憶與遺忘、個人與集體和描述自己命運的主題,都成為《父與子》的骨幹。張曉剛把人物描繪得大於實際比例,以超越傳統肖像畫的格式。父親的形象是年輕的,梳著青年的髮型,可能是強調他作為父親的率直及質樸,加上他修長高佻的外貌為肖像增添了嚴肅感。而男嬰則顯得天真無邪,可以看到他承繼了父親的眼睛、鼻孔、鼻樑和細小的咀唇特徵。男嬰的生殖器官反映了父輩擁有男嗣的傳統自豪,同時也標誌著孩子的性別。男嬰的雙眼透露出意外的成熟和智慧,他的姿態和凝視坦率,肘部彎曲,雙臂輕鬆地搭在他的高腳椅上,擺出對話的姿態,看起來比他的父親更有自信。

我們放在孩子身上的注意力進一步受到他那超現實的黃色肌膚所深化。化表了中國皇室的黃色,說明了傳統中國家庭把希望及期許投放在長子身上,那個肩負著姓氏的傳續和遺產繼承的人。張曉剛慎重地透過畫布來連結血緣,把人物形象連成一線,擴展至根本不存在的父慈子孝的紐帶。更獨特的是,男孩的手似乎輕輕地拉著弦線,彷彿聰明如他的孩子知道自己已經誕生到一個複雜和煩瑣的世界上。

油畫《血緣:父與子》的沈默與詩意來自張曉剛採用戲劇性的側光,但是他故意克制黑暗與光亮的範圍,強調人物的平靜,儼如一種幽閉的情感空間。藝術家對光影的象徵性運用突出了這種氛圍。在他早期的朋友與家庭的肖像畫中,光線是文字及符號,暗示張曉剛對人物的希望及愛慕的情感。男孩身處家庭中,就是我們的注意力和愛護的焦點,但是男孩身上背負的壓力,某程度上也來自國家。這種情況下,人物風格化的提昇,油畫的規模,抑制的色調,隱喻張曉剛的人物是非凡的,成為中國過去,現在和將來的里程碑。
出版
Yibo Gallery, Painting Genius: Academic and Un-academic, Shanghai, China, 2001 (illustrated, p. 89).
Queensland Art Gallery, The China Project, Queensland, Australia, 2009 (illustrated, p. 218).
展覽
Shanghai, China, Yibo Gallery, Painting Genius: Academic and Un-academic, May 2001.
Queensland, Australia, Queensland Art Gallery, Zhang Xiaogang: Shadows in the Soul, 27 March-28 June 2009.

拍品專文


In the monumental canvas, Bloodline: Big Family - Father and Son from 2001 (Lot 1021), we can see how, as Zhang expanded his series, the core myths became even more refined, his approach to the genre of portraiture at once more mysterious and deeply conceived, with Zhang revealing powerful statements on the nature of fate and history, simultaneously asserting an utterly unique view of painting, portraiture, and subjectivity.

Zhang Xiaogang was influenced early on by the photo-realist works of Gerhard Richter but after his first visit to Europe in the early 1990s, during which he visited museums to see the much-beloved artists of his student days, he became aware of how different his methods and interests were from these artists. Where Richter was seeking to create a painterly relationship with still photography, Zhang sought to create works that exaggerated photographic effects, and he has stated that he is "seeking to create an effect of 'false photographs' - to re-embellish already 'embellished' histories and lives". As such, Zhang is engaging our familiarity with a recognizable visual form - the archival family photograph and the painted portrait - to critically explore our own emotional associations and assumptions. A similar relationship to history and memory can be found in the works of Hai Bo, wherein he reproduces vintage family photographs alongside his staged reunions of the original subjects. These diptychs speak volumes in their absences and in their details - the missing presumably departed sister, the youthful likenesses now tired and aged. Zhang's project however is not merely documentary. Instead, it is driven by his interest in finding a way to visually articulate what he views as the collective disposition of his generation. Zhang said, "For me, the Cultural Revolution is a psychological state, not a historical fact. It has a very strict connection with my childhood, and I think there are many things linking the psychology of the Chinese people today with the psychology of the Chinese people back then."

These themes of memory and forgetting, of the individual versus the collective, and of the role one has in writing one's own fate, are foregrounded in "Father and Son". Here Zhang presents his figures as larger-than-life, their monumentality highlighting again their symbolic import over their conventional "portrait". The figure of the father is presented as young, his hair youthfully cut, emphasizing perhaps his innocence and naivete as he embarks on the project of fatherhood. His features are narrow and elongated, adding to the solemnity of the portrait. The baby boy is cherubic, but we see echoes of his father's looks in the arch of his eyebrows, the bridge and nostrils of his nose, and his petite set mouth. His genitals are on display, demonstrating the father's traditional pride in having a son, while also serving as the only attribute marking the child's gender. The boy is depicted as oddly mature and wise beyond his years, his forthright posture and gaze - elbows bent and arms resting on his high chair in a relaxed, conversational pose - renders him more self-assured than his father.

Our focus on the child is further highlighted by Zhang's surrealistic yellow flesh tone. The Chinese imperial color, it suggests the hopes and expectations placed on the first-born son in a traditional Chinese family upon whom the burden of maintaining the family name and legacy is placed. Zhang's discreet bloodlines wind through the canvas, drawing the figures together and into the broader field of filial ties not present. Uniquely though, the child seems to gently hold one of the threads in his hands, as if this uncommonly wise child is aware of the complex and burdensome world he has been born into.

As with the muted and poetic Bloodline: Father and Son canvas, Zhang employs a dramatic raking light, but his range of darks and lights is deliberately restrained, emphasizing the flatness of his figures as well a kind of emotionally claustrophobic space. This tone is further underlined by the artist's symbolic use of light. In his earliest portraits of friends and family, patches of light were literal and symbolic, suggestive of Zhang's feelings of hope and affection for his subjects. Here the "patch" becomes increasingly stylized and symbolic. The boy is the focus of our attention and affection, as he would be with the family. In this context, the increased stylization of the figures, the scale of the canvas, and limited palette, suggest that Zhang's figures are larger-than-life metaphors, monuments to China's past, present, and future.

更多來自 亞洲二十世紀及當代藝術

查看全部
查看全部