LIU WEI
劉煒

革命家庭系列

細節
劉煒
革命家庭系列
油彩 畫布
1991年作
簽名:劉煒

來源
意大利 私人收藏 (直接購自藝術家本人)
歐洲 私人收藏 (直接購自上述收藏)


中國先銳藝術其中一項最引人注目的範疇是對人物傳統的重視。對成長於共產主義下的藝術家來說,由於受到意識形態的箝制,以抽繪人物來表現個人的批判及藝術立場是近年最主流的發展。九十年代初的中國先鋒藝術家把人物作為主要的描繪對象,以其豐富的藝術史底蘊及文化意義來配合他們在藝術上的形象及批判實驗。對北京玩世現實主義藝術家劉煒及其同輩藝術家來說,天安門事件及其後消費物慾橫行成為一個時代的傷痛。劉煒及同代藝術家的不妥協精神,與奧圖.狄斯 (Otto Dix) 及喬治.葛拉斯 (George Grosz) 等柏林達達畫家在歷史背景及批判性取態方面有諸多相似的地方,他們超現實的當代諷刺作品針對描寫對象道德淪喪的行為。要了解劉煒的世界須先從自由破格及充滿諷刺意味的《革命家庭》系列開始。
劉煒的父親是一位軍官,因此劉煒很早就開始利用軍人家庭這個熟悉的形象,藉以反思中國的過去與未來。是次晚間拍賣兩幅完成於1991年的作品,揭示了劉氏對軍人世家的追慕之情,同時卻又表現出他近於恐懼和急欲擺脫那個世界所表現的意識形態。兩幅作品均展出於1993 年的威尼斯雙年展,作品充份表現劉煒對國家巨變在個人心理上之影響。作品以肖像照為構圖藍本,《革命家庭系列》(Lot 1032) 似乎是畫家父親的人物在朱德像前留影,朱德是老革命人物,亦是紅軍創立人之一。直至文化大革命前,朱德一直是中共及解放軍高層,並在1973年重新復職。劉氏的父親身穿整齊軍裝及配上勳章在朱德像前,像遇上名人或在蠟像館中留影,表現出當時大眾對政治人物懷著似有還無的崇敬之情。
劉氏處理筆下人物及其構圖表現了微妙的分野。朱德像以當時流通全國的官方照為本,看來超然物外,他的外貌自然紅潤、眉挺唇閉,如官方肖像般,以銳利的目光投向觀眾。但劉煒卻以構圖與設色來打破畫朱德的權威。他以奇怪的青山、花叢及藍天取代了空洞的背景,更甚地他以不甚完美的人物造型掩蓋了朱德像,阻隔了朱德的目光。兩者的對比十分明顯,仔細地看,前景人物的一切都不太對勁:兩眼不對稱,目光呆滯, 兩唇歪斜,露出不整齊的牙齒,他的勳章更像是胡亂釘在胸前。劉氏故意把扭曲的部份精巧地表現出來,使觀眾對這看來幼稚的情景同情,亦對身體的不完美產生抗拒。
這些技巧可見於另一幅《革命家庭系列 (三人像)》(Lot 1033)。比照張曉剛筆下肅穆的共產年代家庭合照,劉煒作品的色彩表現了文革時文宣的陳套及人工化色調的風格。在畫中同樣可見漫畫化的風景,藍天上有棉花糖般的雲,那一片水色可能代表了中國人對無論是人工或是自然山水的自豪,那可以是水壩工程,亦可以是長江一遊。然而,背景缺乏景深加上人影,使得這如前作一樣,角色只是立在一個畫作之前,而不是在實景。合照因何而起已不得而知,因為景觀已為三人所掩蓋。父親形象的人物一再出現,伴著中央一個女性,及一位可能是畫家自己的年輕軍人。在這畫作中,人物特徵更為突出,兩個男人的目光同樣呆滯,微開的雙唇同時現出兩人不正的牙齒。身形比例較大的女性表達了她對畫中男人的征服,然而她的造型亦同樣奇怪陰沉,頭髮由幼細筆觸堆砌起來,而身旁的年輕人則是最為異相,目光最呆滯的角色。
在這兩幅畫作之間,我們已能看出技巧的嬗變,象徵了劉煒及其一輩對傳統的狐疑。他故意以虛假的風景、異相、目光呆板的人物來質疑中國對其軍事傳統的自豪,同時亦懷疑這一輩是否須要作出傳承。他的「灰色」幽默作為玩世現實主義作品的重要元素,同時欣賞著荒唐與悲哀。劉煒揭示了他不斷探討的問題,他筆下的人物既無助亦無能,在自身外在的交互影響之下,顯得如此腐朽。對劉煒來說,社會規範與人的本性永遠矛盾,其中的破壞力在肉身崩壞中展現了出來。
來源
Formerly the property of an Italian collector, acquired directly from the artist
Acquired from the above by the present European collector

拍品專文

One of the most striking and abiding aspects of the contemporary Chinese avant-garde has been its investment in the figurative tradition. For artists who were raised under communism, with its ideologically-laden strictures on visual culture, the opportunity to appropriate the human figure to suit one's own critical and artistic stance has been one of the most fundamental and liberating aspects of the recent era. The central artists of the Chinese avant-garde in the 1990s placed the human figure at the center of their practice, adapting its rich and complex art historical legacy and cultural relevance to suit their own formal and critical experimentations. For Beijing-based Cynical Realist Liu Wei and his contemporaries, the tragedy of the Tian'anmen Square incident, followed by the hollow ideals of consumerism sweeping China, resulted in a kind of generational malaise. As such, the profoundly non-conformist spirit of Liu and his contemporaries has many parallels with the historical circumstances and critical disposition of Berlin Dada painters such as Otto Dix or George Grosz, artists whose surrealist contemporary caricatures seized upon the degenerate moral character of their subjects and their actions. For Liu, a reckoning with his contemporary world began with an investigation into his own personal relationships in his exuberantly surrealistic, iconoclastic and emotionally ironic paintings of Revolutionary Familes.
Liu Wei's father was a senior general in the military, and from his earliest works, Liu enlists the ubiquitous imagery of life in a military family to critically reflect upon the nation's past and its future. The two works from this series featured in the Evening sale, both painted in 1991, reveal Liu's own filial empathy for his military family, as well as his burgeoning, almost Oedipal need to separate himself from the ideological underpinnings of that world. Both paintings were featured in the Venice Biennale in 1993, testimony to Liu's prescient and precocious appreciation for the challenges facing a nation in transition and its personal and psychological ramifications. Both paintings adopt the format of formal photographic portraits. In the first of these canvases, what appears to be the artist's own father poses before a formal portrait of Zhu De. Zhu was an early revolutionary and is considered the founder of China's Red Army. He acted in various senior capacities in government and in the People's Liberation Army until his dismissal during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), though he was subsequently rehabilitated in 1973. Liu's father, dressed in his own military dress costume, complete with his ranking stars and medals of honor, stands before the portrait as one might pose for a photograph at a chance celebrity sighting or at a wax museum, a symbolic claim of affiliation that may or may not be real.

The subtle distinctions between Liu's handling of the composition and its figures reveals his own underlying and conflicting feelings. Zhu appears larger than life; his image drawn from the many official portraits of him that circulated at the time. His features are smooth yet fleshy; his mouth is sternly set, his brow arched, his powerful gaze fixed on the viewer in the convention associated with formal portraits of Communist leaders. But Liu undermines the authority of the image with his compositional choices and paint handling. Replacing a blank studio background, Liu adds a ridiculously verdant scene of green hills, cartoonish flowering shrubs, and a balmy blue sky. The authority of the figure is further undermined by the figure posing before him, blocking Zhu's gaze with his own far less-polished visage. The contrast between the two figures is striking. Upon close inspection, everything about the foregrounded figure is slightly off-kilter. His eyes are asymmetric; his gaze is vague and unfocused; his nose appears to be slightly cooked; his parted lips reveal a mildly comic overbite, and his three medals are pinned almost haphazardly to his chest. Liu's handling of the paint here is essential, the skewed details of the figure detailed in extreme minutiae that moves viewer's senses, evoking our sympathy for his somewhat unkempt and naive performance, and repulsion towards the intense corporal reality of the flesh.
These techniques are equally on display in the three-figured painting also from Revolutionary Family Series. Contra Zhang Xiaogang's solemn depictions of Communist-era families from the same period, Liu's color choices evoke the campy optimism and Technicolor palette of Cultural Revolution-era propaganda. Here again is the cartoonish landscape, bright blue sky and cotton candy clouds, the suggestion of a body of water referencing perhaps China's enormous pride in his natural and man-made landscape - be it a major dam project or a trip to the Yangtze River. However, given the artificiality of the depthless scene and the shadows of the figures, Liu suggests that, like the preceding painting, this trio is not posing before a natural scene, but rather a representation of a natural scene. What occasioned the photograph, we cannot know, as the view is ultimately obscured by the three figures standing tightly together. Here again is the father-figure from the previous painting, standing alongside a central female, and a younger soldier (perhaps the artist himself). Here the handling of the flesh and features becomes more pronounced in its detailing; both men's gazes are blank and unfocused, both with their lips parted revealing buck-toothed overbites. The female looms over the other figures, suggesting their emasculation, while here too her features are lugubrious and subtly out alignment. Her hair in particular is a thicket of fine, miniscule brushstrokes, while the youngest figure's features are the most malformed, his gaze the most dull.
Already between the two paintings, we see the evolution of this technique, symbolizing Liu (and his generation's) distrust of the legacy they were inheriting. His treatment of the figures - the deliberately cartoonish and artificial environment, the malformed flesh and unsteady gaze of his subjects - to suggest the dubious value of the nation's pride over its military history, while at the same time doubting whether or not the current generation is up to the task of maintaining it. Essential, too, is his "grey" humor, a signature element to of Cynical Realist works, a simultaneous appreciation for the absurd and the tragic. As such, Liu enters into a problematic that he would continue to elaborate and explore throughout his career: his figures are at once helpless, hapless, and corrupted, a corruption at once intrinsic and extrinsic. For Liu, social norms are at perpetual odds with essential human impulses, a tension which ultimately finds release through the corruption of mortal flesh.

更多來自 亞洲二十世紀及當代藝術

查看全部
查看全部