細節
廖繼春
游魚
油彩 畫布
1961年作
簽名︰繼春

來源
藝術家家屬舊藏
2003年10月26日 佳士得香港 編號 123
現藏者購自上述拍賣

出版
1992年7月《台灣美術全集 4 - 廖繼春》藝術家出版社 台北 台灣 (圖版,第27圖,第68頁)

廖繼春在台灣西畫的發展上有著重要的地位。一方面在於他在這方面的貢獻,多次入選日本帝展、台展及府展,是當時很高的榮譽;另一方面在於他的創作成就。在第一階段的創作中,以《有芭蕉葉的庭院》(圖一)為代表,他揉合後印象主義及野獸派的特色,構圖、風格是以寫實具象為主導。但廖繼春沒有把自己的創作局限在寫實,並已開始醞釀抽象畫的探索,認為「畫抽象畫是自然的趨勢,因為現代繪畫已由外界視覺的,轉為內心感情的直接表現」。所以當他面對1950年代以來西方抽象藝術思潮的興起,他是極少數老畫家中能積極探索、積極回應,開創了風格的新發展方向。踏入第二個創作階段,由野獸派轉入抽象表現主義,但貫徹始終的是他對色彩美感的追求。台灣第一代藝術家群中,能在50歲之齡,以前輩身份卻從事抽象的探索,而色彩表現又能如此圓熟、充滿活力,廖繼春是極少數的例子。在台灣新生一代藝術家乃至評論者眼中,「乃成為穿越文化季節變化的一棵畫壇的長春樹」、是「跨越時代鴻溝的彩虹」(林煋嶽語)。

從1950年代中期到1970年代,是廖繼春藝術歷程的第二階段,也是他的創作高峰,藝術家在風格上有了極大的發展和突破,整體而言有愈趨抽象化的傾向。今天在美術史上討論的廖繼春代表作品都幾乎是來自這個時期。創作於1961年的《游魚》(Lot 1014)便是來自這個時期的代表性作品,是藝術家這時期創作中,最為抽象的作品之一。

平面的色彩空間
廖繼春這個時期的抽象創作,儘管色彩成為主導,但總會保留若干物象的輪廓線、空間的遠近,但《游魚》之獨特在於,在「形」和「色」的二元中,更偏向表現主觀的色彩印象,作品抽離了形象,創作重點完全從造型轉變為色彩、光亮的表現,也十分注意色面的營造,純粹以色彩表現情感、情境和氣氛,可以說是在1960年代朝向抽象表現的實驗與探索中,最早、走得最遠的例子之一。畫題雖為《游魚》,游魚的物體造型、輪廓卻被隱匿於色彩塊面中,反而是黃紅藍綠各種強烈的色彩在畫面上自由流動、鋪展、滿溢於畫面。《游魚》在主題上屬靜物一類,卻不在表達立體空間感,也不受單一光源的限制。藝術家把畫面經營為一個平面的色彩空間,沒有遠近距離,只有色彩的閃爍對比和運動節奏。《游魚》的創作年份是1961年,這是十分重要的資訊,提供了一個嶄新角度去理解廖繼春的風格變化。美術評論者常會提到1962年是廖繼春風格發展的一個轉捩點。同屬第一輩的藝術家李梅樹就曾概括提到:「(廖繼春)1962年應美國國務院邀請赴美訪問,轉道歐洲考察,受到抽象繪畫觀念的啟示,畫面的形色更加自由奔放,已經溢出野獸主義的範疇了。」反映一般美術評論者的觀察和印象。但如果觀察《游魚》,則會令人驚奇地發現,在赴歐美前,廖繼春的風格已有極強烈的抽象表現風格,摒除了寫實形象、超脫了敘述客觀環境之意圖,純粹以筆觸之自由奔放、色彩之絢麗濃郁來呈現一個具美感的色彩世界。歐美之行可以說是加速了他對抽象表現畫風的汲取和回應,但這種風格之轉換還是根源於藝術家本人的思考,也更多出自他50年來對色彩表現的探索,深具原創意義。因此之故,我們不能把廖繼春的色彩藝術和西方抽象表現主義完全等同起來,也要更細緻地理解廖繼春運用抽象表現的繪畫語言時,如何結合了他的色彩美學,突顯他作為藝術家的獨特個性和東方文化根源。在這方面,《游魚》是一個很好的範例。同類的例子還有1957年的《樹蔭》(圖二),兩相比較,又能發現我們這幅《游魚》的色彩表現更為自由、更為明麗,兼具美學意義和色彩美感。

「我利用簡潔強烈的色彩,以對比和強調來賦予更多的色感,同時在線條的構成中注意造形的趣味。不是寫某一時間內的印象,而是把希望表現的色感表現出來。」 – 廖繼春

在台灣藝術家群中,廖繼春一向以用色獨特大膽和色感敏銳著稱,色彩表現力也是無人出其左右。他的色彩極為絢爛豔麗,粉紅色、藍色、綠色都是最常使用的色彩。《游魚》畫面所見,四處散佈、點染了粉紅、藍、綠等色彩,但更多以鮮黃、亮白為畫面主色調,這也是廖繼春作品中相對少見的色彩表現。色域廣闊,對比強烈。他的色彩不是以點染、細密的筆觸出現,而是大筆洗刷,揮灑奔放,呈現富有節奏變化的色彩塊面。筆勢在畫布上縱橫馳騁,色塊在畫面上自由奔馳,層層疊疊交織鋪排出繁密的景象,俐落而有強烈的動感和韻律性。大紅、大綠、大黃,都是難以駕馭的色彩,偶一不慎,即落鄙俗。但在廖繼春筆下,卻有很好的表現。黃和白的色彩有強烈的對比,明亮鮮明,純為原色,極為厚重,但也絲毫不顯沉重或凝滯,又能使畫面洋溢喜氣洋洋氣氛和高貴感。主角黃色,使畫面顯得明快活潑,華麗繽紛,彷彿陽光照映在瀲灩的水波表面,水波或受光、或不受光,幻化為閃爍的碎片。畫面色彩又彷彿呈現為落英繽紛,浮沉於水面;或是水池中魚躍水轉,一派喜氣洋洋。由具象轉化為色彩的世界,色彩又引領觀賞者對情境的聯想,這是廖繼春運用色彩,表達情緒、氣氛的優秀例子,和他所喜愛康丁斯基的早期抒情性抽象作品(圖三)有十分相似的藝術風格。這種風格,已經超脫出野獸主義的範疇,而把抽象主義的繪畫觀念滲透。

在《游魚》中,穿插其間的白色依然扮演著區隔調和顏色的角色,但白色和黃色的併合,卻益發增加了黃色的鮮明亮麗,也中和了黃色的強度,使觀賞者能順著白色色彩的流動,而窺見隱藏於黃色色彩中的藍、綠、粉紅,色彩之間因此組合成各種交織的層次、微妙的遞轉。在另一個觀賞角度來說,彷彿白色成了畫面主調,而黃色變成了穿插、過渡的色彩,色彩主客關係出現遞轉和變化,整個畫面的色彩有一種流動的視覺效果,這也是《游魚》引人入勝的地方。以色彩突顯色彩、以色彩帶領色彩,無疑是廖繼春表現色彩美感的最佳例子,也是藝術家「色彩魔法師」的具體表現。

廖繼春敢於用色、用原色、用極鮮極濃的主觀色彩,甚至已經超過了野獸派的色彩,如美術評論王秀雄曾認為「野獸派大師的作品,竟沒有廖繼春來得大膽而有力⋯⋯廖繼春畫面的那一種色彩交響曲般的和諧和灑脫,在西洋野獸派大師的作品上,難於尋覓得到。」西方野獸派開啟了色彩表現的風潮,廖繼春則把色彩表現更為發揚光大,建立明亮絢麗的色感世界,以色彩創造一種屬於東方的美感和想像。
來源
Formerly the Property from Artist's Family Collection
Christie's Hong Kong, 26 October 2003, Lot 123
Acquired from the above by the present owner
出版
Artist Publishing Co. Ltd., Taiwan Fine Arts Series 4 - Liao Chi Chun, Taipei, Taiwan, July 1992 (illustrated, plate 27, p. 68).

登入
瀏覽狀況報告

拍品專文

Liao Chi-Ch'un's contribution to the field of Western paintings in Taiwan and his creative achievements have made him one of the most prominent figures in the field in Taiwan. His works were frequently exhibited at prestigious exhibitions such as the Imperial Art Academy, now known as the Japan Fine Arts Exhibition, and the Taiwan Viceroy Art Exhibition. The Courtyard with Banana Trees (Fig. 1) was an archetype of his first creative stage, distinctive in the blend of Impressionist and Fauvist features and the realistic, representational composition and style that control the aesthetics of his works. Liao, however, did not confine himself to this realistic depiction, instead he began to explore the idea of Abstractionism, believing that "abstraction is the natural trend since modern painting has transformed from the visual and external to the direct expression of inner, spontaneous sentiment." It was exactly because of this conviction that Liao, when encountered the rise of Western abstract artistic thoughts in the 1950s, was among the few established artists who actively explored and responded, resulting in a new artistic direction. While Liao's second creative stage witnessed a turn to Abstract Expressionism from Fauvism, his quest for colour aesthetics never ceased. The artist, who devoted himself to abstractionism at the age of 50, was one of the very few among first-generation Taiwanese artists; he was exceptional both for this atypical endeavour and the masterful application of vibrant, spirited colours in his abstract art. In the eyes of younger Taiwanese artist and art critics, Liao Chi-Ch'un was "an evergreen that went through the evolving seasons of culture" and "a rainbow that arcs across the gulf of time" (Lin Xingyue).

The second creative stage of Liao Chi- Ch'un stretches from the mid-1950s to the 1970s, a period that is also recognized as the height of the artist's career. Liao achieved a major breakthrough in style which as a whole was directed towards abstraction. Works from this period are representative of the artist, and are often used as illustration in relevant art historical discussion. The Fish (Lot 1014), was painted in the same period and is the most abstract piece of Liao's ouevre.

Two Dimensional Colouristic Expression
Reviewing the dominant characteristics of Liao's works during this period, one observes that, Liao always preserves some outlines of his subject and some semblance of spatial depth. The Fish is unique in its strong abstraction and a purely subjective expression of colour. Given the binary nature between "form" and "colour", the artwork seems to have departed from any representational forms; but with an emphasis on colour and light and the composition of colour planes. Colours become the sole and pure means to express sentiment, scenario and ambience. Amidst the tide of exploring and experimenting abstract expressionism in the 1960s, this work is undoubtedly one of the earliest, and most successful attempts. Notwithstanding its title, the work exhibits blocks of colours in their entirety that conceals any shape, not even silhouette, of the fish. It is the liberal flow and sprawl of vibrant colours - yellow, red, blue, and green - that suffuse the whole canvas. The Fish , as its theme suggests, is a still life, and yet it is unconstrained by any single light source. The artist construes it as a flat surface of colours with no sense of distance but the startling contrast and the pulsating rhythm of hues.

The year, 1961, in which The Fish was painted, is crucial for our understanding of Liao's stylistic transformation. Art critics generally refer to 1962 as the turning point in his course of stylistic development. Li Mei-shu, a first-generation contemporary of Liao, once remarked: "[Liao Chi-Ch'un] visited the United States in 1962 at the invitation of the U.S. State Department. After that he travelled to Europe and was inspired by the concept of abstract painting. His works became more unbound and had moved beyond Fauvism." This commitment also reflects the observation and impression of most art critics. The Fish, however, suggests a different perspective. Examining The Fish, one will be surprised by how Liao's style strongly inclined to Abstractionism even before his journey to Europe and the United States. The Fish showcases a complete abandonment of narration and realistic form with a turn to the creation of a realm of aesthetics through the pure application of vivacious colours and unrestrained brushwork. Liao's trip had boosted his reception and response to abstract art, but the change in style is rooted in the artist's mentality, probably as a product of his ardent study of the expression of colours for 50 years. This is where his innovativeness lies, independent
of the influence from Western Abstract Expressionism. The art of Liao calls for a more delicate interpretation of his abstract artistic language - how he fuses with his aesthetics of colour, and how the art highlights the artist's unique personality and cultural origin. In this respect The Fish is an excellent sample. Shade (Fig. 2), painted in 1957, offers a similar vantage point, which by comparison underlines the more liberal, gleaming colours of The Fish.

"With the use of simple and strong colours, I confer through contrast and emphasize a richer sense of colour on the work. With the lines I pay attention to the amusement of the figure engendered. I am not depicting an impression of a given time. I am expressing those senses of colour that I want to express." - Liao Chi-Ch'un

As a Taiwanese artist Liao Chi-Ch'un was renowned for his bold use of colours and his sensitivity towards it. The expressiveness of Liao's colours is unparalleled. In his works, there is always a riotous display of luscious, striking hues: pink, blue, green being the most common. In The Fish , these three colours scatter over the canvas, but the primary tone is the relatively rare bright yellow and white, which also single out the uniqueness of this artwork. The broad range of colours contrast with each other strongly. His shades do not come as sprinkles or fine strokes; rather, they are bold, incursive brushings of hues, altogether untrammelled and forceful, producing dynamic planes of colours. Those dazzling reds, greens and yellows - the class of recalcitrant hues that grow vulgar almost without a hitch - are tamed by the artist's paint brush. The thick pigments of yellow make a sharp contrast with the white, and with their radiance and purity they bring a joyful and grandiose atmosphere to the painting without the slightest sense of ponderousness. The overwhelming hues of yellow also give birth to liveliness; hence the canvas becomes vivid, energetic and splendid, evocative of sunbeams reflected on rippling waves which, either being absorbed or reflected, transform into sparkling fragments. The drops of colour on the canvas seems to liken fallen petals that float on the watery surface - or else leaping fishes amid the flowing current, engulfed in felicity. This is how Liao, by availing himself of the variety of colours, expresses emotion and ambience: from the substantial forms to the realm of colours, the latter of which leads its audience to a multitude of pictorial imagination, just as what Kandinsky, one of Liao's favorites, showcased in his early works of lyricism (Fig. 3).


An even closer reading of the painting draws us to appreciate The Fish from another perspective. The interspersing whites seem to have segmented and mediated other colours throughout the composition. Siding with the yellows, these whites enhance the brilliance of the yellows and yet neutralize their intensity. The audience is invited to move with the flowing whites to unveil the blue, green and pink within the yellow blocks. Between colours which transmute delicacy there are myriad levels of integration. In yet another perspective, the whites become the primary tone of the work while the yellows, leading a transitional role, disperse among other hues. The ever-changing relationship between colours produces a radiant flux, visualizing the glamour of The Fish in which colours accentuate and steer one another. It is a perfect example to fully illustrate the way Liao, the "colour magician", expresses his aesthetic of colours.

Liao's valiant use of primary, vivid and intense colours has surpassed the Fauvist choice of colours, as Wang Hsiu-Hsiung, an art critic, commented, "the art of Liao is even more audacious and powerful than those of the Fauvist masters K that harmonic and unshackled aura of Liao's works is almost like a symphony. We would search in vain for all this in the Fauvist oeuvres." While Fauvism in the West brings along a wave of colour expressionism in the world of art, Liao Chi-Ch'un elevates it, arraying to us a vibrant realm of colours with all the senses it kindles, and creates accordingly a wholly Eastern aesthetics and imagination.

更多來自 亞洲當代藝術及中國二十世紀藝術晚間拍賣

查看全部
查看全部